Rayca Science Molecular intelligence

One loop, inside your institution: evidence is resolved into a record, attrition becomes constraints, models and physics test each idea, and your scientists decide what is made.

Lead optimisation generates more evidence than a project team can hold. Too little of it shapes the next design.

Where R&D loses time and evidence today, and how Rayca addresses each point.

01

Fragmented evidence

Measurements sit across registries, plate exports, structural files, contract research reports and minutes. They are rarely reconciled into one decision-grade record, so each cycle is designed on a partial view of what the program has already measured.

How Rayca addresses it

One program record

Every measurement normalised, linked to its source and protocol, with conflicting results preserved rather than averaged.

02

Attrition that is not retained

The reasons compounds are discontinued are documented in reports but seldom translated into design rules. Liabilities characterised in one series can recur in the next.

How Rayca addresses it

Constraints with their evidence

Each supported liability becomes an explicit constraint, carrying its evidence, applied to every new design.

03

Models that do not transfer

Models trained on public or historical data often generalise poorly to a program’s own chemical series and rarely state their confidence, so a reliable prediction and an extrapolation look the same.

How Rayca addresses it

Program-trained models with uncertainty

Models learn from the program’s record, report how sure they are, and show where the evidence is thin.

04

Scarce synthesis and assay capacity

Design and make cycles are long and costly, yet candidates frequently reach the bench without rigorous physical evaluation of the hypothesis behind them.

How Rayca addresses it

Physics first, decisions with scientists

Hypotheses are tested in order of computational cost, and each cycle ends with a traceable recommendation your team approves, changes or rejects.

The program record 01

Why it matters

Decisions start from the full evidence of the program, with its provenance intact.

Resolving the record

IngestNormaliseLinkHold conflictsVersion

Registries, assays, structures, reports and notes are read where they live.

Attrition into constraints 02

Why it matters

Liabilities a program has already paid to discover stay discovered.

From attrition to constraint

Program series

Set aside
Set aside
Set aside

Trace the attrition

Each discontinued compound is linked to the measurements behind the decision.

Design constraint

Avoid this group at this position

Discontinued compoundsRelated compoundsIndependent evidence

New designs

Waiting
Waiting
Waiting

Program-trained models 03

Why it matters

Predictions a project team can weigh, because their limits are visible.

Developability profiles

Program-trained models

PotencySelectivitySolubilityPermeabilityClearanceSafety
  • Train on the record
  • Predict with uncertainty
  • Show thin evidence
  • Refresh each cycle

Each endpoint model learns from the program’s own measurements.

MeasuredUncertainty

Physics before synthesis 04

Why it matters

Synthesis effort goes to molecules that have already passed a physical test.

Physics in order of cost

Docking

Docking

Fast, broad

Molecular dynamics

Slower, follows motion

Free energy

Costly, decisive

Inputs recordedVersions recordedParameters recordedOutputs recorded

Dock

Fast pose generation for the candidates that pass the constraints.

Agents and decisions 05

Why it matters

Every recommendation can be traced, questioned and overruled.

Agents, critic, decision

PlanExecuteCritiquePackage the decisionYour team decides

A planner breaks the program question into steps for specialist agents.

The loop closes 06

Why it matters

Each cycle begins from more than the last one did.

Closing the loop

This cycle

  • Experiments run with your approval
  • Results join the record
  • Models retrained, constraints revised
  • Design starts further ahead

Run the experiment

In your laboratory or through an approved partner laboratory.

See it on your own program. Engaged program by program, within your institution.