Rayca Science Compute governance

The heavy work of molecular science is planned, placed, supervised and recorded by the system itself, within the budgets and policies your team sets.

Computational chemistry and molecular AI compete for the same infrastructure. Neither is governed as part of the science.

Where R&D loses time and evidence today, and how Rayca addresses each point.

01

Two workloads, managed apart

Physics-based simulation needs long, tightly coupled runs on HPC clusters; molecular AI needs short, high-throughput inference on GPUs. They are typically run by separate teams, schedulers and scripts, with no common view of the campaign.

How Rayca addresses it

One control layer

Every request is routed to the resource it needs, and both workloads are planned, supervised and recorded the same way.

02

Allocation without scientific priority

Compute is consumed in queue order rather than by scientific value. Costly methods are applied where a cheaper one would resolve the question, and budgets are reconciled after the fact.

How Rayca addresses it

Plans checked against policy

Before any job starts, methods are costed against what they can resolve, and the plan is checked against the budgets, priorities, residency and approvals your team sets.

03

Silent failure in long campaigns

Interrupted jobs, unstable trajectories and unconverged calculations are often discovered late, sometimes after their results have informed a decision.

How Rayca addresses it

Supervision and recovery

Running work is monitored, restarted from its last good state when it fails, and verified for convergence before results are used.

04

Reproducibility and data governance

Results become hard to reproduce once software, force fields and model versions change, and specialised compute can require proprietary structures to leave controlled environments.

How Rayca addresses it

Lineage, inside your institution

Each job runs within your environment and is recorded with its inputs, versions, resources and outputs, so it can be replayed and audited.

Two kinds of compute 01

Why it matters

Scientists ask the question; the system decides where and how it runs.

Routing the work

Control layer

One place to plan, supervise and record

PlanPlaceSuperviseRecord

HPC clusters

Simulation · long, tightly coupled

Molecular dynamics
Free energy
Quantum chemistry
Enhanced sampling

GPU accelerators

Inference · short, high throughput

Structure prediction
Generative design
Property models
Pose scoring

Simulation

Dynamics, free energy and quantum chemistry go to HPC.

Planning against policy 02

Why it matters

Compute is spent where it changes a decision, and only where it is allowed.

Planning a campaign

  • Read the question
  • Estimate methods
  • Check policy
  • Commit the plan

Policy

BudgetPriorityData residencyApprovals

What must be resolved, for which molecules, and to what confidence.

Placement and scheduling 03

Why it matters

Throughput comes from scheduling, without moving your data.

Placement

Survey resources

Clusters and accelerators available to the program.

Supervision and recovery 04

Why it matters

Long campaigns finish without anyone watching them overnight.

Supervision and recovery

MonitorDetectRecoverVerifyEscalate when needed

Progress, resources and health of every running job.

Dynamics replica
Free-energy window
Dynamics replica
Quantum calculation
Free-energy window

Verification

Review requested

A decision is needed, not a retry.

Model inference 05

Why it matters

Inference fast enough to explore and careful enough to trust.

Serving molecular AI models

Requests

Design agentEvidence agentSimulation agentDesign agentCriticEvidence agent

Grouped into batches

Accelerator

Version pinned
Structure modelDesign modelProperties model
Model version recordedReliability
Prediction returned

Load

The right model version is loaded onto available accelerators.

Lineage 06

Why it matters

Computation that stands up to scientific and regulatory scrutiny.

Lineage for every job

Inputs

Structures, molecules and parameters exactly as submitted.

See it on your own program. Engaged program by program, within your institution.